Ravi Kishan seeks court intervention to dismiss an FIR: A woman purporting to be the second wife of Ravi kishan

Ravi Kishan Seeks Power Move to Quash FIR-Alleged Second Wife of Actor

Aparna Soni, a 54-year-old woman who claims BJP’s Gorakhpur MP Ravi Kishan as the father of her daughter, took her battle to the Bombay High Court on Saturday. Her aim: to quash an FIR filed against her by Kishan’s wife, Preeti Shukla, at Lucknow’s Hazratganj police station.

Shukla’s accusation is weighty: she alleges that Aparna, also known as Aparna Thakur, demanded a staggering ₹20 crore, threatening to falsely implicate Ravi Kishan in a rape case. In the legal petition, submitted through advocate Ashok M. Saraogi, Aparna, along with her husband Rajesh Soni and their 25-year-old daughter Shinova, named in the FIR, vehemently denied these allegations. They argue that the charges, ranging from criminal conspiracy to criminal intimidation under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), are baseless and driven by malicious intent.

A key contention from Thakur’s legal team is that the FIR represents an abuse of the legal process. They argue that a notice sent by Thakur to Ravi Kishan, asserting Shinova’s biological relationship with him, cannot be construed as extortion or any criminal act. Moreover, they highlight the jurisdictional discrepancy, noting that the FIR was lodged in Lucknow despite the involved parties primarily residing in Mumbai.

Thakur’s advocates further claim that the FIR is an attempt to silence her and her family from asserting Shinova’s rights as Ravi Kishan’s biological daughter. They emphasize Thakur’s prior legal action in the City Civil Court at Dindoshi, Mumbai, where she sought a declaration of Shinova’s paternity rights. Thakur contends that the FIR is a retaliatory measure against her pursuit of justice through legal channels.

In her plea to the Bombay High Court, Aparna Soni seeks the dismissal of the FIR, arguing its lack of substance and misuse of legal procedures. Additionally, she requests a stay on any further proceedings related to the FIR until the court reaches a decision. The upcoming session of the court is expected to address both the paternity dispute and the plea to quash the FIR, shedding light on this complex legal battle.

The legal saga surrounding Aparna Soni’s claim against Ravi Kishan’s paternity and the subsequent FIR filed against her unfolds against a backdrop of tangled emotions and legal intricacies. At the heart of the matter lies a contentious battle over identity, legitimacy, and the pursuit of justice.

For Aparna Soni, this legal journey represents a quest for recognition and acknowledgment of her daughter’s rights. The decision to approach the Bombay High Court reflects her determination to challenge the accusations leveled against her and to seek redressal through established legal avenues. At stake is not just the resolution of a familial dispute but also the broader principles of fairness, equity, and the rule of law.

On the other hand, Preeti Shukla’s decision to file an FIR against Aparna Soni underscores the gravity of the allegations and the need for due process. The accusation of extortion and false implication in a criminal offense carries significant repercussions, both legally and socially. For Shukla, the FIR represents a means to protect her husband’s reputation and integrity amidst a potentially damaging controversy.

The involvement of multiple legal jurisdictions adds a layer of complexity to the proceedings, raising questions about jurisdictional competence and the enforceability of legal decisions across state boundaries about Ravi Kishan. The choice of venue for legal recourse can have far-reaching implications for the outcome of the case, adding strategic significance to the legal maneuvering of both parties.

Beyond the legal intricacies, the case also highlights broader societal issues surrounding paternity claims, family dynamics, and the intersection of personal relationships with public personas. The scrutiny and public attention accompanying high-profile disputes like this one can amplify the emotional strain and exacerbate existing tensions, further complicating efforts to find a resolution.

For more Bollywood updates. click here.